It's funny that you say that about the debate, because the only time I noticed a discrepancy it was the other way around. I thought they were trying to hide McCain's baldness by zooming in. Wasn't paying attention the whole time though, maybe they spent more time giving us a close-up of Obama's hotness...either way, I think McCain would probably benefit from a wider shot. And let's hope the debate wasn't televised in HD; his mummy-esque appearance would have been too shocking for the viewing public.

On the question of time that it will take you to get to Vegas, knowing how much you and your mom will love the experience of driving cross-country and won't want it interrupted by potty breaks or stops at Jack-in-the-Box (greatest curly fries in the country), I'll guess a mere 84 hours, or 3.5 days. (My dad and I did the same drive in about 24 hrs, but we took turns driving and went straight through). Good luck and God speed!

Sunday morning I was watching both candidates on various Meet-The-Press type shows. O. was elegantly angled, as if a Sears Portrait Studio employee had posed him. M. faced the camera dead on, mug shot style. Perhaps this can join your observations as evidence of cameraperson bias.

My guess: three score and ten hours.

PS Before you choose an apt in Vegas, ask current residents if they've had a problem with scorpion infestation. The leasing company will lie to you.

 THanks for the tip, Counselor Sharon.  Just what I need, ONE MORE THING TO WORRY ABOUT. 

Oh, and thinking about our contest, there's also a prize for the person who can guess how much money it will cost to get from detroit to vegas...in an SUV filled with boxes of books.

i didn't make a guess for teh first one because i have control over how long it takes us to get there adn it'd be unfair...but i'll guess we're going to spent $890 on gas.  

I have only your best at heart, my dear:
http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/NV-Las-Vegas-Fountains-At-Flamingo-...
http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/NV-Las-Vegas-Fountains-At-Flamingo-...
http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/NV-Las-Vegas-Fairways-at-Southern-H...

Scorpions?!

$745

I have a friend in Vegas...he's actually a native. He's not in the traditional Vegas professions, but he does lie about when he'll return phone calls. Oh yeah, and he graduated from law school about a year or so ago. He's a fun guy, for a workaholic. I'll hook you up with his phone number.

Why did you go to law school?

Interesting. Because I would have pegged you as a liberal. Just because.
But it turns out you're more "my kind of guy". ;-)

Yeah, Chill and Play Fair would be good advice to both sides. Although I am sure it will go mostly unheeded. BTW looking forward to your response to Annonymous (above) about why you went to law school. :D

I would also like to know why you went to law school...

After all, you invested 3 yrs of your life and ended up with a "highly addictive" (according to my girl-friend, who is now a big fan.....and reads your blog religiously....and now when she read that you are working on your second book, she wants to know where she can reserve a copy....) law school memoir.

Unless you have lawyer-like job planned, how will you pay back your parents for law school? I thought your father expects you to finance his retirement beach house in Florida????

Counselors,

I went to law school because I was told that I had to if I was going to practice law.

Seems to me you just want to "play" lawyer and that you don't want to have a real job at all - ever.

Well, Counselor Anonymous, you obviously don't know me very well then.  But that doesn't surprise me; I try to stay away from people who make unfounded, mean-spirited verbal attacks.  Seems to me that you just want to "play" asshole - really.  

P.S., I'm impressed that you have time to hold down a real job AND make these attacks.  Way to multitask!

Question for Anonymous: what is your definition of a "real job" and why do you consider it the telos of existence?

Uhhhh....since when was being an author of widely published memoir not considered a "real job"???

After all, it is currently #22 on Amazon.com's rank in category: Books > Biographies & Memoirs > Professionals & Academics > Lawyers & Judges.

#26 in category: Books > Entertainment > Humor > Lawyers & Criminals

I also recommended his book to a former colleague from work, who is seriously considering applying to law school (but unsure since everyone is against it) after being laid off from Wall St.

I wish I can quit my job and get paid as an author............

It's politics man. Everybody always getting there panties bunch.

Las Vegas is cool. This time of the year it's great, but I just moved here about 5 months ago and the Summer was hell.

It's funny how you get anonymous hate comments once every couple of months. I'd like to think that there are all kinds of people out there who hate you so much that they talk shit to you on your blog and amazon book reviews, but I have a feeling that it's just one jealous loser. Sorry Lax.

I'll never understand people who post anonymous criticism on the internet. Or Republicans. Those are two things I will never understand. And probably the Rule Against Perpetuities. So three things.

Are you planning on going for the Nevada Bar while you're in Vegas?

First, a disclosure: I am Rick's uncle and mentioned in his book.

I am also a lawyer of 38 years and have been writing and published since I was 16 (Kennedy was President). The two avocations are not mutually exclusive, but one pays better. I encourage young Richard to pursue both and - most of all - to follow his heart and passions.

 Thanks for the support, Counselors.

-No plans to take the Vegas bar.  I mean, don't get me wrong, the Illinois bar was a blast and all...

And yes, Counselor Jaffe is right about the monetary thing...which is a factor for me.  Many of the worst lawyers out there make more than the best writers. 

As a conservative republican, I have not had my views seriously represented in DC by anybody lately (except for those glorious GOP rebels in the House), so the "Play Fair" gambit doesn't work with me. Besides, the personhood question is too important to let anyone mess it up, no matter how well qualified they may be in other respects. I am not a knee-jerk total free market fan, nor am I able to trust Big Gov's never-ending promises to do a better job controlling my life. But if we fail to develop a rational consensus about what a "person" is, then Big Gov has a blank check on control over any "non-persons" it may define into being. Therefore, I could never vote for any pro-abortion candidates ever. Ever! Why? Because that position contains the seeds of everything Orwell feared. Using carefully parsed language to define some humans into the club and some humans out, then using the language of "choice" to describe the ultimate deprivation of "choice," death, is a brilliant demonstration of double-speak. It completely obfuscates the importance and difficulty of knowing what constitutes a person, and how a person should be treated by society and society’s law. And I will not vote for someone who furthers that confusion. Nobama for me. Sorry.

All these threads and commotion for revealing his future plans as a side-note....

Lawyer Boy is one of the best books I have ever read...If anonymous had actually read your book, he/she would have realized that your aspiration of law school was not simply about becoming a lawyer. Do whatever the heck you want to do with your life, and tell everyone else to shut it, lol. You are incredibly talented, and have an amazing piece of literature to show for it.

P.S. Please finish your next book soon.

Gosh, Counselor Reformer, not sure what to tell you.  I know you feel that Bush2 shafted you...(played up his Jesus love during elections...then left you behind)...but I don't know how much sympathy I can give you for that.  It's like, he represented that he was a 10 on the Jesus scale and turned out to be a 9.  And you bring up Abortion, which, I realize, is a huge issue for most of America.  The hugest issue, for many.  I think you and I are both surprised that it's barely getting a mention in this campaign.  Why do you think this is? 

 Oh, and thanks for the kind words, Counselor Kristen...the suspiciously kind words...

"literature?" Oh, puleeze.

Counselor Anonymous, 

For somebody who dislikes my writing so much, you sure read/comment on my blog a lot. 

"Suspiciously kind?" Sorry for any suspicion...I was just a little perturbed by the comments from Anonymous and felt the need to interject. I seemed to have further provoked the situation, though, which was not my intent.

P.S. Anonymous, look up the definition of "literature."

Didn't ask for sympathy. Just explaining to you why I have no sympathy for the implied moral equivalence in "giving the other side a turn." I am not a utilitarian. I am a theist. Therefore I don't buy the moral equivalence theory. The good guys gotta win, eventually.

BTW, Bush2 didn't "shaft" me respecting the personhood issue. His judicial picks were great for our side. He did disappoint me on government spending. Big time. Also, I think his theory that a totalitarian culture could be transformed by a war was deeply flawed, though I am less sure he was wrong or dishonest about the WMD issue. History will bring greater light.

But I do find it interesting you assume his "Jesus" pitch is what got my buy-in. Not so. I maintain that one does not need to hold a specific variety of theism to realize that we need a good, durable social contract on the meaning of the term "person." Bush represented that he would go that route, so he got my vote, and would get it again vs Obama. Therefore, your response was conclusory at best, i.e., without sufficient basis, like answering "yes" to a law school essay. Why did you make this assumption about me? Just curious.

Your question concerning the relative silence on abortion in this election is intriguing. I propose that most people are more concerned with their own financial well-being than they are the well-being of the millions of tiny humans that will never see the light of day. Out of sight, out of mind. By contrast, hard-core pro-lifers like me can see beyond the current international and economic turmoil to perceive a more distant future where human slave labor is manufactured and disposed of as needed by Orwell's hogs. We don't like that vision, so we work against it. But we are few in number. The masses move like water under the tidal forces of the current crisis. Nevertheless, we do what we can, because we must. Your theory?

ok, counselor

sorry about teh assumption. just heard lotsa christians saying they felt shafted by GW for the reasons i had mentioned. guess you're not one of them. check.

next, you can be a theist and a utilitarian. met some people who identify as both. you could argue that you can't be a devout christian and a util (because christianity has a deontologial moral code), but you can for sure be a simple theist and util. no conflict there.

last, not sure i buy the out of sight out of mind...cause abortion is no more out of sight in 2008 than it was in say, 2000, when it was a huge deal in the prez election...it's usually a huge deal...actually, i'd use it to generally refute the whole 'out of sight, out of mind' saying...

k...gotta end this post. have a good night, counselor.

Good Point. I agree that the McCain of 2000 would have said something completly different than the McCain of 2008.

LawyerToe

More, as long as you are willing to live with the consequences of openly declaring your political beliefs. I post about politics on my blog from time to time, but since I'm only a moderate-liberal (c.f. 85% of all college and law students ever) it isn't such a huge "stand".

That being said, now that you're out of law school, gotta find something else to talk about right?

Hmmm...not sure about those consequences. But whenever I talk politics, I always censor myself a bit. Yeah, I shouldn't be blogging about politics...

Yes, a terrorist attack would clearly benefit McCain, and it was silly for him to react the way he did. He has military experience, unlike Obama, and is a bona fide American hero.

While I think McCain's likely harder stance on terrorism is something people should consider, I don't think that this is the reason that "terrorism is a Republican issue". Rather, it seems that conservatives are both:

A)likely to vote Republican because of their small government, take-back-the-south, NRA loving ways

and

B)unnecessarily afraid of terrorist attacks, just as they are afraid of anybody foreign, anybody that looks foreign, spicy food and contraceptives.

Hopefully, no terrorist attack will happen in the next year and the global increase in respect that America will receive by electing somebody that doesn't look like Mr. Rogers will help keep them to a minimum.
Unfortunately, terrorist organizations thrive on opposition and have been known to plan attacks in coordination with elections to scare people into voting for a polarizing figure.
We'll see what happens...

Yep, you should definitely do more political posts. First of all, politics is just life and it's always fun and interesting to hear other people's views. Secondly, you do need something else to talk about with law school done and over with.

Just be prepared for the occasional non-friendly who might drop by courtesy of Google. But do not be afraid ... blog on!

okay, counselor ryan, point taken, but terrorist IS a republican issue in that most people who hold terrorism as their #1 issue tend to vote Republican. thats all that means.

I like the blog, it was interesting and I hadn't heard about it. I think it's non-controversial so it won't ruffle anyone's feathers. By the way, the "win your book contest" drum rolls are starting to give me a headache... who won?

Ah, yes, the winners. It was a close competition. Really, a lot of the responses were great. It was not an easy choice. I picked Adam and MMC and, kinda, Dan. Dan was my #1 pick, but he had won the quick reply contest. And then there was a 2nd place tie between MMC and Adam. Then there were a few honorable mentions. Yeah, like I said, from reading the replies, it became clear that many RL.com readers are funnier than me.