November, 2008

The Media's Allegedly Impossible Standard Of Beauty: Las Vegas Observation

 

The theory goes like this: advertisers present female consumers with an ideal, impossible standard beauty. They do this so women feel perpetually inadequate and insecure, which keeps them buying and buying in the hopes of achieving the unachievable, of becoming one of the magazine women. The magazine women, though, have no real world counterpart. They’re not only the product of plastic surgery, personal trainers, makeup artists and hair stylists, but of Photoshop artists. They’re a myth.

There’s a hole in that argument, but you won’t spot it by reading the above paragraph alone. If you spend some time in the Bellagio, though, you’ll spot the hole for sure. You’ll spot it walking by you every few seconds. I did last night, at least. The supposedly impossible standard of female beauty is not only possible, not only achievable, but has been achieved, by every other woman in the place.

Technorati Tags:



Did you take that picture

Did you take that picture yourself?

 the pic is from the Bank,

 the pic is from the Bank, the nightclub at bellagio.  it was taken by somebody who wasn't me.

Having you, a mid-20s male,

Having you, a mid-20s male, judge the female perspective of beauty is like having a boar judge a prix fixe meal at Charlie Trotters. Pardon my analogy, but my point is that those women use tons of beauty products to look as they do, and even so, still find plenty to fret over.

Faulty logic, counselor.

 INteresting analogy,

 INteresting analogy, Counselor Susie.  Begs the question, who WOULD be in the right position to judge female beauty?  You said judge the "female perspective of beauty," and I guess I'm having trouble understanding exactly what you mean by that.  But you're right about me not being a woman, and I'm sure if I were, I'd have a different perspective.  Now, do you believe that beauty (sexual attractiveness, in this case) is an objective or subjective matter?

Beauty is definitely an

Beauty is definitely an objective matter. It is measurable (bra size, weight, etc.).
For example, everyone would rate the girls I have dated a 10 out of 10 (10 being at least 91% beautiful).

 Counselor Ryan, stop

 Counselor Ryan, stop acting like you're being facetious when you're only being half-facetious. 

How old are you people?

How old are you people?

My physical body is 25, but

My physical body is 25, but people tell me I have an old soul...which means my soul has to get up 6 times a night to go pee but my body just stays asleep and lets my soul wet itself.
How old are you, son? You're old enough to use your parents' internets but not old enough to stop being a whiny man-baby, so I'm guessing somewhere between 13 and 40. Am I right??



A Bit More Complex than the Rules of Fight Club

 

A month ago I bought a Casio 76-key electric keyboard. It came with a list of 13 “IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS.” Number five, for example was “Do not use this apparatus near water.” And number 11 was “Only use attachments/accessories specified by the manufacturer.”

I now present you with IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS numbers one through four:

(Before I do, please believe me when I say this is not a joke. Really. This is what safety instructions one through four say. Swear to God. Okay? Okay.)

1. Read these instructions.
2. Keep these instructions
3. Heed all warnings
4. Follow all instructions

Technorati Tags:





Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers and Roro The Clown

 

If you’re anything like my parents, you’re probably wondering what I’ve been up to these past two days. Here goes:

November 18th: Bought Malcolm Gladwell’s new book Outliers. Read Malcolm Gladwell’s new book Outliers. Better than Tipping Point, worse than Blink. Here’s the one sentence summary: all those amazing people out there, who, by the sheer force of their talent and perseverance, have defied the odds and succeeded wildly…have gotten some help along the way—more than you realize.

November 19th: Cleaned cat hair from all my clothes, argued with a bookstore employee about the existence of ghosts, ate manicotti with a promo model, contact juggling/card manipulation lesson with Roro The Clown, then Root Beer Vodka shots.

Technorati Tags:





Lawyer Boy Book Reading Pics From The Detroit JCC, November 16th 2008

 

Technorati Tags:



Looks like you're working

Looks like you're working the bar in the second pic...Woudl have made a book reading even more fun.

The JCC SO needs a bar.

The JCC SO needs a bar.

How come no one wanted to

How come no one wanted to sit by you?

They did, but I wouldn't let

They did, but I wouldn't let them. I'm THAT big now.
(Famous, not obese. But that could flip-flop by the end of book #2).

...which might hurt your

...which might hurt your game with the ladies, but would also provide lots of material for Book #3



Diplomacy in Card Counting, Diplomacy in the Air

 

Two days ago I got kicked out of Gold Coast for card counting. I was playing at the ten-dollar minimum bet table, so I didn’t think they’d watch me too carefully, but clearly I was wrong. I’d only been playing an hour. The pit boss told me they security had tracked my play over fourteen double-decks. At first, I played dumb, and the pit boss went, “Sir, let’s not insult each other’s intelligence here.”

What a diplomat.

When I get back to Vegas next week, I’ll try counting at a different casino. Hopefully they’re not in sync.

IN OTHER NEWS

I don’t often say obnoxious things, but often think of obnoxious things I could say. For example, yesterday I was flying back home to Michigan to do a book reading, and on the plane I was reading Psychology Today magazine, and I didn’t have my personal light—the one next to the air jet—turned on because it was too bright and hurt my eyes. So the stewardess came over, gave me a funny look, reached above my head and turned my light on for me, and then gave me another funny look. I just looked back at her.

“What,” she said, “you like reading with the light off?” She said it like I had offended her.

Here’s what I probably should have, but didn’t say in response: “What I like is like making decisions for myself.”

I chickened out thought.

Technorati Tags:





Criss Angel: BeLIEve. Not My Review, But Some Other Ones. My Review's Pending.

 

Last night I saw Criss Angel’s show BELIEVE at the LUXOR.

A lot of magicians don’t like Angel, but the fact is, the guy has performed more magic on TV than anybody else in history, and he’s gotten to do that because TONS of non-magicians like him. And I’m a fan of anybody who brings interest to the field of magic. It’s a dying art and we need more magicians like Angel, who bring it to different types of people.

As for Angel’s stage show, which opened a week ago…reviews haven’t been good. Actually, they’ve been awful.

There are three types of awful theatre reviews. First of all, there’s the classic “Here’s Why This Show Sucks Review” Example: Joe Brown’s Las Vegas Sun review:

“Cirque throws everything in its considerable arsenal of stage genius at Angel — the expected array of lush, loud music, expert dancers and aerialists, lavish settings and boundary-breaking special effects, all intended to amaze. The single most amazing thing about “Believe” is that it’s still so boring. For a reported $100 million, Cirque has bought itself its first bona fide bomb….A charmless mook, Angel is a rudimentary stage performer—he’s barely believable playing himself.”

Next, there’s the There’s Nothing To Even Review Here, So I’m Going To Review On My Own Cleverness Review. Example: Reed Johnson of the Los Angeles Times wrote this:

“Believe that it's unbelievable. Unbelievably bad. In Las Vegas, his mash-up with Cirque du Soleil is a magic trick gone terribly wrong. If Criss Angel were blindfolded, straitjacketed, run over by a steamroller, locked in a steel box and dumped from a helicopter into the Pacific Ocean, he still might be easier to salvage from disaster than "Criss Angel: Believe," the gloomy, gothic muddle of a show that officially lurched into being on Halloween night like some patched-together Frankenstein's monster.”

Lastly there’s the I’ve Been A Professional Theatre Critic For Two Decades And You Seriously Expect Me To Waste My Time On This? You Do Well, Seeing As Though I’ve Got A Stoner Teenage Boy To Put Through College And I’m Contractually Obligated To Review This Abortion Of A Production, I’m Going To Do So The Way A My Son Would Because That’s What The Show Deserves Review. Example: In the Las Vegas Review Journal, Doug Elfman wrote this:

“Wooooooooow. Criss Angel's new Cirque du Soleil show is terrrrrrible. I had heard firsthand from some people who had seen "Believe" that it was abysmal and maybe unfixable, creatively. So my expectations were rock-bottom low (although open-minded), when I saw it Friday on opening night. And yet, it was EVEN WORSE than how it was described to me…Obviously, "Believe" was not made to be bad on purpose, and that makes things even worse, since they are TRYING to make a great show.”

I don’t think any of these reviews (or any other review I read) truly captured the show. I’m beginning to write my own review today and you’ll find it in my upcoming book…in like two years….but until then, let me ask, why do you think some people either LOVE or HATE Angel so much. Do you guys even watch his show/know who he is?

Technorati Tags:



Who be this Angel of whom

Who be this Angel of whom you speak?

Is that ebonics or

Is that ebonics or victorian? 

 

This show was so, so bad I

This show was so, so bad I don't even know where to begin. I honestly went with an open mind; despite the dreadful reviews thus far. One positive thing I can say is that the theater is absolutely beautiful--and that's about it, as far as praise goes. First of all, there was so much smoke in the theater (to cover the trap doors and wires) that I could hardly tell the difference between Criss Angel and the robotic rabbits jumping around. Second, the plot (if one existed at all) was completely UN-recognizable. The "Nick and Jessica Variety Show" (as amateur as it was) had a bigger WOW factor. Third, if for some odd reason, Cirque has decided to add LIVE animals to their otherwise flawed reputation, could they please find another way to rid the doves from the stage besides having them fly into the walls and drop to the seats in the back of the theater when they miss the hole in the wall? Unacceptable. Forth, may I suggest Criss Angel lose the potty mouth and delete the break-dancing parts of the act? How in the world Cirque du Soleil and/or Luxor has lowered themselves to this deplorable level is beyond my wildest imagination. Anyone touting that BeLIEVE is worth $99, $125 or $150 of your hard earned money is clearly on the Luxor or Angel payroll.

I went to see this show on

I went to see this show on December 8th. I dont no what all the bad comments are about because ii thought it was great. People expect to go and see mindfreak. Criss is preforming on a theatre were he only has a limited amount of supplies. He gets involved with the audience a lot and pumps them up. He has humour and almost always has his shirt off:). he was on a stage and one second latere he was right next to me like HOW DOES THAT HAPPEN . he also does other small tricks that wre interesting. You just got to go think positive. The dancing was great and i was always on the edge of my seat. I love criss angel, im a huge fan and i will never be dissaapointed about tis production. I am starting to save money for my next trip.



Let's Try An Experiment

 

Let’s try an experiment. I want you to take a few seconds to look through the cards in the above photo, and then I want you to select one on them in your mind. It doesn’t matter which one you pick, but be sure that you pick one before you read the paragraphs below or the comments.

Really—pick a card first and then continue reading.

Got one? Good.

I bet you picked the four of hearts. Most people do, and there’s a reason for it, which I will share in a future post…but before I do, I’m curious to hear what YOUR thinking process was like. Did you pick the four, and if so, why? And if not, why?

(I’m asking these things because I’m thinking of putting this trick/experiment in my next book and am curious to hear how often it works.)

Thanks,
Ricky

Technorati Tags:



The 4 of hearts is the

The 4 of hearts is the prominent one because of the angle you are holding it at and because of the less "eye catching" (how else to describe them?)cards around it. Stands out, so I noticed it first, but I deliberately picked the K of hearts because I thought you wanted me to pick the 4. Man, any psychology majors want to weigh in on this?

I picked the Ace of

I picked the Ace of Diamonds. I think that you telling us that most people choose the 4 of Hearts is the actual trick. So there.

By the way why are the cards

By the way why are the cards mirrored? And why are the number on the right corners, don't cards only have the numbers on the top left, no matter how you turn them? What's going on here? Am I over analyzing this? Damn you Rick, I'm supposed to be reading for crim law.

King of Hearts.

King of Hearts.

Why are you wearing glasses?

Why are you wearing glasses? I picked the Ace too. Why would you think most people will pick the 4 of Hearts? So far, you are wrong.

I initially chose the seven

I initially chose the seven but thought it was a lazy choice because it stands out as a different color. I considered the Ace and the king because I am an elitist, but settled on the nine of diamonds. The four was the only one that I ignored, oddly enough.

Nice beard.

I picked the four of hearts!

I picked the four of hearts! I was trying to pick the card that you wouldn't expect. I didn't pick the king because it was too obvious, everyone loves the face cards. The 7 of clubs stood out too much because it is the only black one. I liked the four because it was hard to read backwards so I somehow thought that most people wouldn't pick it.

I did pick the four of

I did pick the four of hearts. I tried not to think of a reason and just went reflexively. My guess is that it is picked most often because it is the card that sits the highest when fanned out - the top of the card is slightly above all the others.

Four of hearts. The King was

Four of hearts.
The King was too obvious, I thought you expected us to pick it. Other than that ... I really don't know, except that the 7 looked stupid. Yeah, I know, that really made a lot of sense. NOT!

I picked the 9 because nine

I picked the 9 because nine was number for sports. This trick doesn't work, Ricky. I thought you were going for that one trick... by the guy that uses the logic of trying to cleverly guide you to pick a certain card by giving hints when he talks to you (which I thought was the K bc you are pointing to it.) Brown something was his name? I don't remember.

I picked the picture of the

I picked the picture of the coffee cup in the background. I rarely do what I am told.

I chose the Ace of Diamonds.

I chose the Ace of Diamonds. However, just before scrolling down the page I glanced at the 4 of hearts and contemplated changing my decision...

Cathrine
(Austalia)



Update: The Clerk Now Says They Received And Counted My Vote

A mix-up at the office, I'm told.  Pile of votes that were received but not processed when I had called.  I must have asked TWENTY TIMES whether there were any votes that were received but not processed yesterday, and they kept saying No, No, No....and, well, turns out that's exactly what happened.

 

Technorati Tags:





They Didn't Count My Vote and I'm Fu#&ing Pissed

 

I’M FUC*(#&$G PISSED. Pardon my language but that’s what I’m feeling right now. I’ve tried SO FU@#U#@NG HARD to cast a ballot, and it looks like my vote isn’t going to be counted. I requested an absentee ballot from the Clerk’s office TWO WEEKS ago, and when it didn’t show up a week later, I requested ANOTHER ONE. THAT ONE showed up on Saturday. I promptly filled it out and went to the United States Post Office and paid $16.50 to OVERNIGHT the ballot to Michigan. The Postal worker assured me it would be on Monday. Well, somebody f@#*#ked up because it’s not there. I just called the clerk’s office and they told me they hadn’t received my ballot, and that the shipment of overnight mail from the Post Office had already arrived. My ballot wasn’t in it. So I called the Post Office in West Bloomfield and they said they didn’t have my ballot either. I put my parents’ address down as the Return Address, but it’s not at their house either. So, yeah, I’m f#*@king pissed because I’ve been denied my right to vote. I really wanted to participate in this election too. Tell you what, I know you’ve already decided who your voting for, but maybe…if you’re voting in Michigan (which, once again, I’m apparently NOT), you haven’t decided about the ballot initiatives yet. Maybe you don’t even know what they are. A lot of people skip over them ‘cause they’re tough to read and understand. One of them is Stem Cell research, the other is Medical Marijuana, and I encourage you to vote YES on both of them. Maybe everybody in your life is healthy and grand, but if not, let’s help them out. (And even if everybody is healthy and grand in YOUR life, there are a lot of sick people out there who could use some comfort and cures).

Technorati Tags: