July, 2008

Apartment Trash Chute Run: Moldy Soup Pot/Sweaty Underwear Edition

 

The BAR EXAM is in just THREE DAYS (!), and this will be my last blog post until then so I’ll make it really good. That said, THIS happened to me tonight:

After a 40-minute cardio workout, I got ready to take a shower. But before I hopped in, I decided to wash this pot half full of soup that’d been sitting in my sink for over a week. I’ve been putting it off ‘cause it had green and white foam on it, and, well, I just assumed that if I left it next to the sink for long enough, somebody else would wash it for me. (Live alone, bad plan.)

Because I don’t have a garbage disposal, I decided that I’d toss the contents of the pot down the trash chute, which is just ten feet from my apartment. I put my sweaty underwear (boxer briefs) back on, took the pot to the chute….bumped into the door, which spilled some moldy soup on me…and then threw the rest down the chute. I walked back to my door…and realized that I had locked myself out.

So there I stood, nearly naked, sweaty, holding a still-moldy pot, and locked out.

F#*k.

After a minute or two of freaking out, I knocked on a neighbor’s door. And I don’t know who answered, but I know it wasn’t my neighbor. It was some girl. And after two minutes of awkward conversation, I convinced her to go down to the lobby and get the spare key for me.

HOPEFULLY the bar will go smoother than that. We shall see.

WELL, now that I’m going on a three-day blogging break, I just wanted to say thanks again to all who bought and read Lawyer Boy. If you enjoyed the book or are feeling particularly generous as you read this, it’d be great if you could do these things:

1) Email a friend or two about the book. Or mention it on your facebook/myspace profile. Or your blog. Or maybe get a tattoo of the Lawyer Boy cover on your forehead.

2) Go to Amazon.com and write a review of the book. A handful of jealous guys on the law school web forum LawSchoolDiscussion.com have been encouraging people to write bad reviews of Lawyer Boy on Amazon.com without actually reading the book. (And I implore you not to stoop to that level, only review if you’ve read.)

3) Wish me luck on the bar.

4) Have a great week!

Technorati Tags:



So this is the first time

So this is the first time I've posted on your blog.I should have done it sooner, you know, to congratulate you on graduating law school, to congratulate you on your book, etc etc. Instead you get this.....you get locked out of your apartment more than anyone I know! Perhaps you should look for an apartment with a door that doesn't involve keys. Or never leave your apartment. Or at least make a point to wear pants when you do, becasuse you know what's gonna happen.

WHY does situation you got

WHY does situation you got into not surprise me? I don't think it surprises Karen K at all either. By the way - HI Karen! Congrats on YOUR book too!

You should buy one of those

You should buy one of those fake rocks to hide your spare key. Just keep it right outside your door. It'll look natural.

Counselor Linda,   I don't

Counselor Linda,

 

I don't think Counselor "Karen K." is the "Karen K" you think she is.  

 

 

Beat of luck on the Bar

Beat of luck on the Bar Exam, Rick!
And don't worry, I know you will do great. Assuming you don't get locked out of the exam without any pants on, of course!



Bar Exam in Four Days: What Will I Do Without Her?

 

The bar exam is just four days away. I foresee one tiny problem…

I’ve been studying at the Barnes & Noble, every day, next to this lady who wears the same black and white dress every day and talks nonstop. At first it was annoying as hell, and I’d move away from her…but little by little, I’ve gotten used to her (usually socialist) nonstop blabber. Now I wonder whether I’ll be able to focus during the real exam without it.

But considering the fact that ibaby (the Illinois Bar administrators) doesn’t even allow test takers to bring cell phones into the testing site, something tells me they wouldn’t be okay with me bringing the study buddy lady along.

Technorati Tags:



This woman looks like an

This woman looks like an extra from The Dark Crystal--like one of the podlings who gets the life essence drained out of them.

It's unnerving and I wouldn't allow her in a testing site--or near any of my family members--for that reason alone.

Counselor Rachel, That woman

Counselor Rachel,

That woman is my grandmother.

-Rick Lax

PS, no she's not.



Sample Bar Exam Question: Funny Porn Movie Title Edition

 

The bar exam is in just five days. I’m reviewing dozens, sometimes hundreds, of multiple-choice questions every day. Now, for those of you who have no idea what a bar exam multiple-choice question looks like, I figured I might share one with you.

This particular question comes from MicroMash, which is kind of like Princeton Review for the bar exam, only without the classes. Law students, lawyers, and prospective law students are encouraged to leave their answers to the question in the ‘comments’ section below:

If the plaintiff was unable to show bad faith or other extraordinary circumstances, in which of the following situations would a federal district court assume jurisdiction?

A. Plaintiff M has been indicted in a state court for showing an obscene motion picture, “Sore Throat.” He brings an order to the federal district court seeking to enjoin the state prosecution.

B. Plaintiff N is the operator of a motion picture theater. The attorney general of the state has commenced a civil action to enjoin the showing of a motion picture, “The Bevel in Miss Jones,” on the ground that it is obscene. He applies to the federal district court seeking to enjoin the state civil proceeding.

C. Plaintiff O is the operator of a motion picture theater. The local law enforcement officer has informed him that if he shows “De Flowering Inferno” again, he will be prosecuted for obscenity. He brings an action in the federal district court for a declaratory judgment that the picture is not obscene.

D. Plaintiff P has been convinced in the trial court of State X for showing “Sin For Your Supper.” While the case is on appeal to the supreme court of that state, he brings an action in the federal district court seeking to enjoin the state proceeding.

Technorati Tags:



I'll preface my answer by

I'll preface my answer by stating I'm an 0L, LS next year, so no laughing!!

I choose: B

Don't like "A" because if there is no "bad faith" then why not let it go through the state court(s), allowing a community to set the standard

C: A threat by a LEO without being able to show "bad faith", seems like a non starter, immunity

D: reasoning similar to "A", it's already in process and waiting for State supreme, why claim jurisdiction

It would probably help if I understood Jurisdiction :) Still trying to wrap my head around it. Let the slaughter ensue!

In an actual law-practice

In an actual law-practice situation, my answer would be, "I'll be right back," and then I would go look up the answer, something I am very very good at doing, and someone would pay our firm probably hundreds of dollars for that. Under bar-exam-type conditions, though, since for some reason they don't let you look things up, let alone pay you, I think I would pick C.

After some prior research projects that are too dull to relate, whenever I see "federal court enjoin state proceeding" or words to that effect, I now immediately think "abstention" and "Anti-Injunction Act," because those typically preclude federal courts from -- and you may have guessed this from the name of the Act -- entering injunctions. C is the only answer in which there is no pending state proceeding to worry about. Since I think the prosecutor's threat is enough to constitute a "case or controversy," the federal court would be able to take subject-matter jurisdiction and might do so. I am guessing that the bad-faith part of the question is to cover a rule or exception I don't specfically remember where a federal court can get involved if something fishy is going on in the state proceeding. So, that's my answer.

If it's correct, please send me four hundred dollars.

Hope the book is selling well.

I think C. When in doubt

I think C.

When in doubt always pick C.

THE ANSWER: Much like the

THE ANSWER:

Much like the real bar exam, you'll have to wait until October to hear the answer/how you did.

Stay tuned.

The credited answer is "A".

The credited answer is "A". Since "A" involves a criminal indictment using the Miller standards implicated under obscenity ab initio, a federal court would take immediate jurisdiction. "B" is incorrect because it is a civil action, so money damages are only involved under local state law; "C" is incorrect because federal courts don't issue advisory opinions; "D" is incorrect because of ripeness. Since the state supreme court is reviewing the case, the defendant may have the conviction overturned, thus the federal court would decline jurisdiction.



Illinois Bar Exam: The Insane Baby Problem

The Illinois Bar exam is in exactly one week. I don’t feel like I’m prepared—let alone feeling like I’m close to prepared—but I’m told that this is normal.

The subjects are all merging together; I can’t remember which subject I was studying yesterday morning. I think it was Conflict of Laws, but it could have been Family Law. Either way, I remember learning about what to do in the case of an “insane baby.” Mind you, I don’t remember WHAT you do when you have an “insane baby,” I just remember learning that this is an actual legal predicament.

Another predicament, I suppose, is determining that your baby is insane. With older people, it’s obvious. If they say, “The banana patch monster ate my manure sandwich tomorrow,” well, that would be a give away. But with babies, it’s not so obvious. Most of the things that mark as an adult as insane are normal for babies.

The point is, if an “insane baby” question comes up on the bar exam next week, I’m screwed.

Technorati Tags:



You should be more sensitive

You should be more sensitive to people with friends or relatives who suffer from mental illness. Contrary to what you write, those diseases are not always "obvious" in adults nor do they manifest themselves in the silly kind of statement you made up. It is medically impossible to diagnose a baby as psychotic or "insane," the latter of which is not a recognized medical diagnosis, but rather a layman's colloquialism usually used to describe any behavior with which the speaker disagrees or finds strange.

Apparently humor, like

Apparently humor, like mental illness in adults is not "obvious". Insanity is not a medical diagnosis, it's an archaic term of art used in law. I'm sure that most people realize that Insanity is a colloquialism. Law's funny that way. I mean, we're probably the only people left who call seventeen year olds infants. Pediatricians would have a field day with that.

Think insanity is funny, eh

Think insanity is funny, eh Pirates? We'll see how funny it is when I go insane on you.

The banana patch monster ate my manure sandwich tomorrow...the same day that your face ate my fist.

In response to "You should

In response to "You should be more sensitive."

Don't be so sensitive! You are what's wrong with the world today. There is someone like you who has a problem with everything and if you types had it your way, no one would be able to crack a joke.

Just because insanity isn't

Just because insanity isn't ALWAYS funny doesn't mean it is NEVER funny. I have nothing but the deepest sympathy for the tormented souls who are compelled by inner demons to injure themselves, or who are incapable of genuine emotional connection, or who are sincerely afraid that the government is going to invade their brains.

The colorful gentleman on my block who wears a flowing purple dress and sings classic ragtime songs makes me smile. Especially when he stops singing to have a conversation with people including such statements as, "Teacher says he sick of our faces... We're all graduating tomorrow!!"

Also, I have an unusually large mouth. I can fit my fist in it. So it's not at all improbable that I could in fact eat your fist.



Fifty Dollars and Time Served

 

I watch Night Court on TV Land. At three in the morning.

(For those of you younger readers, “Night Court” [1984-1992] is a sitcom about a young, idealistic, unconventional judge [played by Harry Anderson] who sentences flamboyant hookers in short skirts “fifty dollars and time served.”)

The irony is, with my sleeping habits—I suspect I have “Night Owl Syndrome,” which is a real disease, by the way—working at Night Court would be perfect for me. The thing is, as best I can tell, ‘night courts’ don’t exist. Not in Chicago at least.

Does anybody know if they have night courts in New York or anywhere?

Technorati Tags:



That's interesting point. I

That's interesting point.
I don't have the information regarding this.
I'll try search it and 'll let you know if there any.



Lawyer Boy Book Reading Pics

Thanks so much to all who came out to the Lawyer Boy book reading/signing/magic show this week—all 130 (!) of you. Several people have told me that the inscriptions I wrote in their books were illegible.

I have awful handwriting. I get it.

So…in case you were one of those people who got an illegible message, here were some of the more popular ones I wrote. See if the message in your book could be one of these:

“Enjoy!”

“Enjoy the book!”

And, if you are a lawyer, I probably wrote this in your book, “Get ready to defend me when my dad sues for defamation.”

Hope that clears things up.

AND…for those of you who couldn’t make it to the reading, here are some pictures of what you missed:

 

Technorati Tags:





It's Kind of Like The Sixth Sense, Only Instead of Seeing Dead People, I See Lawsuits Waiting To Happen

 

The Bar Exam is in two weeks (!) and this week I began to re-study torts. (For all you non-lawyers, a “tort” is a wrong for which the law provides a remedy). This was my best subject in law school, so I don’t think I’ll spend too much time on it. I don’t know why, but torts come naturally to me. Which is why part of me can’t help but feel that I was born to sue people. Sometimes I kind of feel like the sixth sense kid, only instead of seeing dead people, I see lawsuits waiting to happen.

Yes, I know a lot of people feel that America has become too litigious, and a lot of special interest groups have convinced many Americans that there is a lawsuit “epidemic” going on in the country right now—they ALWAYS use that word, “epidemic.” All I can say to all those people perpetuating that lie is, wait until YOU get hit by a drunk driver, wait until YOUR mother slips on the unsalted Wal-Mart driveway, wait until YOUR kid child is sucked into your neighbor’s pool’s filtration system.

My dad always says, “Everybody hates lawyers, until they need one.”

Technorati Tags:



I often use to find myself

I often use to find myself doing the same thing. Even just crossing the street could result in me considering the possible legal implications ... "it will be your fault if you hit me, buddy!" So I kind of know where you are coming from. Law does give you a warped world view.

But having read part way through your book and considering that you just graduated law school, I am geting a little bit worried for you. Take a vacation and ease off the law stuff, eh?

 Hi Counselor

 Hi Counselor Michelle,

Yes, I plan to do that.

 



Society's Stance on Crying Babies in Fancy Restaurants

 

Last night I was getting lots of studying done (torts, commercial paper, secured transactions) at the Peninsula hotel. And then this baby showed up. Accompanied by parents, of course.

The baby cried for an hour straight, and I wish I were exaggerating.

So…what’s society’s stance on taking crying babies into fancy restaurants? Are we cool with it? Do we sympathize with the parents who have enough to worry about without trying to hunt down a trustworthy babysitter on a weeknight…or do we want (deserve?) some peace and quiet when we’re paying to eat at a nice place? ($16 for lobster ravioli appetizer, which, I learned, contained four pieces of ravioli…COME on.)

Technorati Tags:



Babies in restaurants are

Babies in restaurants are fine. Screaming in restaurants is bad. Screaming babies in restaurants must therefor be determined using a balancing test.

Babies are cute, but aside from re-population are pretty useless.
Screaming really bugs the hell out of me and disrupts my "game".

Screaming babies cons outweigh their pros.
No screaming babies. If a baby starts screaming, one parent should attend to it. The most egalitarian way to decide is to flip a coin. If you don't have a coin, flip the baby. If it lands heads up, then someone takes care of it. If it lands heads down.... well, that's a whole new problem then, isn't it?

 Thanks, Counselor King

 Thanks, Counselor King Solomon.



The State of My Apartment

RickLax.com isn’t just about fun and games, it also serves to inform my mom about the state of my Chicago apartment.  And the state of my apartment is messy.  Here are some photos I took earlier today:  

 

 

 

 On a positive note, mom, if I spend this little time cleaning, imagine how much studying I’m doing.

 

 

Technorati Tags: